Agreement that you enclose, it may be invalid for various reasons, mostly the reasons are valid. Are the consequences of the provision that each other have kept with the contractor, are unfair and will be reimbursed? Not always.
best example of this is the conclusion of a contract of employment by a board member with the company, if this contract the company was represented by another member of the board. This situation constitutes a violation of Art. 210 CCC, resulting in the nullity of the contract. Although there is no doubt that the agreement in this case is void, but this work has been rendered and the remuneration paid.
How then do in this situation? Judicial decisions in this case is different, different views are also experts on the subject. In my opinion, even though the contract is void, there was an employment contract and the company may not require reimbursement paid to board member compensation.
How will the case for other contracts? Keep in mind that often (especially in the provision of services), reimbursement of benefits is not possible. Thus, the request reimbursement will be accompanied by a request for payment for the service provided or goods delivered - though here the basis may be different, such as unjust enrichment.
More about contracts entered into by the company, see the guide "Advisor to the President a limited liability company."
0 comments:
Post a Comment